|
|
|
by invitation of COOL (Campus Outreach Opportunity League) for its National Conference
Aesthetic Realism
Can End |
| Federal
statistics continue to show an increase in hate crimes motivated by race
and ethnicity in our country. That means that thousands of men and
women--as real as you and me—still undergo racial profiling, beatings,
and worse. As a Puerto Rican I also have been the object of racism.
And the question is: why after years of so many people fighting courageously for civil rights—many of them losing their lives for equality; after passionate pleas from churches and universities--why is it that racism and prejudice still persist in our country? |
![]() |
Growing up in Puerto Rico, where most of us are a mixture of African, Taino Indian and Spanish blood, I got the message early that some people—-because of their skin tone, the texture of their hair or how little or much money they had—-were beneath me and my family. While I never considered myself a “racist,” when my grandmother would point to her own cheek and tell me in Spanish, “Don’t bring any girls to my house darker than this,” “no traigas muchachas aquí más oscuras que yo,” I did not object.
I didn’t know then what I would later learn from Aesthetic Realism, that I used the praise I got from my family to feel I was special and superior, and that other people were less real, unimportant and beneath me.
When I came to New York to study at Fordham University in the 1970’s, I was outraged by the racial violence I saw African Americans endure, and the daily awful discrimination Puerto Ricans suffered here on the mainland. But I made no connection between my feeling against this injustice to the way I refused to join clubs and study groups in college that had Blacks and New York-born Puerto Ricans. Shamefully I felt I was better than they were, and that intellectually they would bring me down.
But I also was the brunt of racist comments like "he got into school through a quota," and "you won't make it academically here." Also, at times when someone didn’t understand my accent he would say, “You are in America now—learn English!” And on a few occasions while looking for an apartment, suddenly I would hear “It was rented,” when in fact it was not. Once, I overheard a broker tell a landlord on the phone about me, “Don’t worry, he is light skin and a professional.” In every instance I felt angry and humiliated.
But I didn’t use this injustice to be kinder and to have more feeling for what others have endured, but to feel this world is an insincere mess and I have the right to see anyone or anything as I please, while seemingly acting as if I were above it all. My sense of outrage was not enough to change my own prejudice and how I saw other people.
In Aesthetic Realism consultations
I began to learn—-and this is what changed me—-that even with all the injustice,
what I wanted most was to like how I saw the world different from myself.
In an early consultation, as I spoke about not being able to "connect"
with others, I was asked:
![]()
| Consultants: Do you
like people?
Jaime Torres: People say that I'm nice. Consultants: If those people were able to see what’s in your mind, do you think they would like it? Jaime Torres: Oh no! Consultants: Do you know the difference between acting nice and being kind? Jaime Torres: Wow, I don't think I do! Consultants: Do you think you have fooled everyone... |
| Consultants: Do you know how much that has hurt you? |
I was able to understand the battle
I was in that made me so cold and distant from my patients. In another
consultation I learned about a central cause of prejudice—seeing other
people as only different from myself. My consultants asked:
| Consultants: Do you
think you are more alike or different from your patients?
Jaime Torres: Oh, different. Consultants: That's very dangerous because as soon as you see yourself as different the ego wants to feel superior; and from that many of the horrors of the world have occurred. |
Throughout history, however, people impelled by a desire for contempt have tried to prove the superiority of one race over another. A great deal of pseudo science has come from this, including the Eugenics movement in the 1920’s, and more recently the book The Bell Curve.
In the United States between 1911 and 1930, the idea that some people were of superior stock--and therefore had to be kept “pure”-- was used to pass laws limiting racially mixed marriages and immigration from many countries.
In 1923, Eli Siegel wrote the historic essay: "The Equality of Man," in which he scientifically disproved the Eugenics theory by giving step by step evidence that if all people were given similar conditions—enough food, a place to live, education, enough money, they would be equal.
I respect and admire him so much
because throughout his life, he explained and fought injustice wherever
he saw it. And he also showed the beautiful, ethical alternative.
His love for truth, for the best in humanity, made him courageous.
This essay—written in Baltimore, at a time when Eugenics was so popular
and backed by powerful people in government—reads in part:
| Mind needs nourishment, care, and training all by itself... And the fact is plain enough that millions and millions of people from the beginning of the world…have not got this mind's nourishment, care and training. Their lives were forced to be led so, to get food enough for their stomachs, was all that they could do...I say it is wrong, to say that any one's mind is inferior, until it has been completely seen that it has been given all the nourishment, care and training that it needs or could get. |
| There's no scientific evidence to support substantial differences between groups. The tremendous burden of proof goes to anyone who wants to assert those differences. |
Aesthetic Realism is the education that can teach that way of seeing that has a person sure that being fair to another is the same as self-expression, pleasure and pride.
|